What Is to Be a Christian?

What Does the Bible Say About Eating Certain Fish?

What Does the Bible Say About Eating Certain Fish?The Bible provides guidelines for what animals can be eaten in Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14, where it lists clean and unclean animals. Fish are considered clean to eat if they have fins and scales, while those without these characteristics are considered unclean.Guidelines for Clean and Unclean AnimalsIn Leviticus 11:9-12, God gives instructions regarding what fish are clean, stating, "These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat." Fish without fins or scales, such as shellfish, are considered unclean according to Old Testament law.New Testament PerspectiveIn the New Testament, the dietary restrictions of the Old Testament are reinterpreted. In Acts 10:13-15, Peter is told in a vision, "Rise, Peter; kill, and eat." God declares that all foods are clean, signaling a shift from the old law. However, Christians are still encouraged to live with respect for God’s commands and consider their choices in the light of their faith.Why This MattersWhile Christians are no longer bound by the Old Testament dietary laws, the principles of cleanliness and respect for God’s creation remain relevant. Believers are encouraged to honor God in all aspects of life, including what they consume, with gratitude and consideration.

What Books Were Taken Out of the Bible?

What Books Were Taken Out of the Bible?The Bible we have today is considered by many to be a divinely inspired and complete text. However, not all ancient writings made it into the canon of Scripture. Over time, various books and letters were debated, and some were eventually excluded from the Bible. These books are often referred to as "Apocryphal" or "Deuterocanonical" books, depending on the tradition.What is the Apocrypha?The Apocrypha refers to a collection of ancient texts that were included in some early versions of the Old Testament, particularly in the Septuagint (a Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible). These books were not universally accepted by Jewish scholars, and many Protestant denominations rejected them when forming the canon of Scripture. Some of the books found in the Apocrypha include Tobit, Judith, 1 and 2 Maccabees, Wisdom, Sirach, and Baruch.The Catholic and Orthodox CanonsCatholic and Eastern Orthodox churches include several of these books as part of their canonical Scripture. For example, the Catholic Church recognizes books like Wisdom, 1 and 2 Maccabees, and Baruch as Scripture. However, many Protestant traditions do not include these books, arguing that they were not part of the original Hebrew Scriptures.Why Were These Books Removed?Books were removed from the Bible or not included for several reasons. One key reason was whether they were considered divinely inspired or authoritative. Another reason was whether they were widely used in the early Christian Church. Some of these books were also considered to have questionable theological content or were written too late to be considered authentic by certain religious leaders.ConclusionIn conclusion, the books that were "taken out" of the Bible are primarily those that were included in the Apocrypha but were excluded from the Protestant canon. The reasons for their exclusion vary, but they remain an important part of the historical discussion of biblical canon formation.

What Is the Most Accurate Translation of the Bible?

What Is the Most Accurate Translation of the Bible? The accuracy of a Bible translation depends on how closely it adheres to the original texts and its intended use. Scholars often point to versions like the New American Standard Bible (NASB) and the English Standard Version (ESV) for their precision in reflecting the original languages. Key Features of Accurate Translations Accurate translations prioritize faithfulness to the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek texts of Scripture. Examples include: New American Standard Bible (NASB): Renowned for its literal rendering, it is ideal for detailed study.English Standard Version (ESV): Balances literal translation with readability, making it suitable for study and worship.King James Version (KJV): A timeless translation that remains influential, though its language may be challenging for modern readers. Dynamic Translations for Understanding Dynamic translations like the New International Version (NIV) or the New Living Translation (NLT) are also widely used for their clarity, focusing on the meaning of the text rather than exact wording. Scriptural Assurance Isaiah 55:11 assures believers of God’s Word: “So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please.” No matter the translation, God’s truth remains preserved and powerful. Choosing the Right Translation When selecting a Bible, consider your goal—whether it is deep study, teaching, or devotional reading—and prayerfully choose a version that aids your understanding and spiritual growth.

Why God’s Existence Is Not Special Pleading

Why God’s Existence Is Not Special Pleading When discussing the existence of God, one common objection raised is that the argument for God's existence constitutes "special pleading." This accusation implies that the argument for God’s existence is a double standard, where the existence of God is treated differently from the existence of anything else. However, there are several reasons why God’s existence is not special pleading but rather a valid subject of philosophical inquiry and debate. The Nature of the Argument for God’s Existence Special pleading occurs when one applies a standard or rule to everything except for a particular case without justification. However, the argument for the existence of God is based on a different framework than that used for finite beings or physical objects. The existence of God is a metaphysical question, whereas the existence of finite things is a question of empirical evidence. God, by definition, is the necessary and eternal being whose existence does not depend on anything else, while all created things have contingent existence. The Cosmological Argument One of the most well-known arguments for the existence of God is the cosmological argument, which posits that the universe must have had a cause. The argument suggests that everything in the universe has a cause, but this chain of causes cannot go back infinitely. Therefore, there must be a first cause—God. This argument does not fall under special pleading because it applies the same principle of causality that we use to understand the world, but extends it to the origin of the universe. The cause of the universe, being necessary and uncaused, is distinct from the causes of finite things. The Teleological Argument The teleological argument, or the argument from design, suggests that the order and complexity of the universe point to an intelligent designer. This argument is not special pleading because it uses the same reasoning that we apply when identifying design in human creations, such as buildings or machinery. The complexity of the universe, far beyond anything that humans can create, suggests a purposeful and intelligent creator. In this case, the argument for God’s existence follows the same principles of reasoning used to recognize design in the world, but applied to the cosmos as a whole. The Ontological Argument The ontological argument is another philosophical argument for God’s existence, which asserts that the very concept of a perfect God implies His existence. This argument does not involve special pleading because it is based on logical principles that apply universally. If we can conceive of a perfect being, then that being must exist in reality, because existence is a necessary attribute of perfection. While this argument is debated, it is still a legitimate philosophical argument and is not based on special pleading. Conclusion God’s existence is not special pleading because the arguments for His existence are based on valid philosophical principles that apply universally, whether to the cause of the universe, the design of the cosmos, or the nature of perfection. These arguments provide a rational basis for belief in God, grounded in metaphysical reasoning rather than arbitrary exceptions.